2026:JHHC:9286 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1123 of 2026 --------- Govind Ram @ Ravi Ram, aged 31 years, son of Ranjit Ram, resident of village Latu Fulsu, P.O. & P.S. Bariyatu, Dist. Latehar. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. --------- 03/ 02.04.2026 The counter-affidavit filed by the opposite party-State is taken on record. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 302 of IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act but charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 302/120B/34 of IPC and Section 25(1-B)a/26 and 35 of Arms Act and charge has been framed under Section 302/34 of IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that brother of the informant was found murdered and suspicion was cast upon the petitioner and others. Learned counsel further submits that some of the co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 7380 of 2018, B.A. No. 7793 of 2021 and B.A. No. 11708 of 2021. Learned counsel further submits that implication of this petitioner is on account of suspicion. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 19.08.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the above, coupled with the fact that some of the co-accused persons, having same and similar allegations, have been granted bail by this Court and also looking to the period of custody of 2026:JHHC:9286 2 the petitioner; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar, in connection with S.T. Case No.265 of 2024, arising out of Balumath P.S. Case No. 174 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 866(B) of 2017. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 2nd April, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 04.04.2026