TRIDIV BORAH v. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION. OF INDIA and 5 ORS.
I.A.(Civil)/1158/2022 · 2026-03-05
Devashis Baruah
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3203 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3203 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010065822022
2026:GAU-AS:3407
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1158/2022 TRIDIV BORAH S/O LATE KRISHNA KUMAR BORAH, VILL. CHERAKAPAR, KHELUA GAON, PO CHERKAPAR, DIST. SIVASAGAR (ASSAM), PIN 785640 2: SHYAMAL BORAH (24) S/O LATE KRISHNA KUMAR BORAH VILL. CHERAKAPAR KHELUA GAON PO CHERKAPAR DIST. SIVASAGAR (ASSAM) PIN 785640 3: KABITA BORAH NTH W/O JITENDRA KR. NATH VILL JOTOKIA NATHGAON PO JOTOKIA PS NAZIRA DIST. SIBSAGAR (ASSAM VERSUS LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION. OF INDIA and 5 ORS.
REGISTERED OFFICE- 2ND FLOOR, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, MUMBAI-400021, INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN 2:THE ZONAL MANAGER LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA EASTERN ZONAL OFFICE HINDUSTAN BUILDINGS 4 C.R. AVENUE KOLKATA-700072 WEST BENGAL
Page No.# 2/3 3:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER CLAIMS DEPTT.
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA JORHAT DIVISIONAL OFFICE RAJABARI JORHAT-785014 DIST. JORHAT ASSAM 4:THE BRANCH MANAGER LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA SIVASAGAR BRANCH OFFICE DR ALAM BUILDING BABUPATTY DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM PIN 5:SRI A.C. KHOUND DEVELOPMENT OFFICER LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA SIVASAGAR BRANCH OFFICE DR ALAM BUILDING BABUPATTY DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM 6:SRI GAUTAM BORAH LACHIT NAGAR SIVASAGAR ASSA For the Applicant(s) : Mr. D.P. Borah, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) :Mr. S. P. Choudhury, Standing Counsel
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 06.03.2026
Mr. D.P. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Page No.# 3/3 applicants submitted that taking into account that the applicants herein are claiming their rights under Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938, the instant application filed for substitution of the respondent No. 6 is not pressed.
2. Accordingly, the instant application stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant