M/s. Sri Srinivasa Water Proofings, v. PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS
CC/370/2026 · 2026-06-18
Ninala Jayasurya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3203 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3203 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010535422025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 370/2026 Between:
1. M/S. SRI SRINIVASA WATER PROOFINGS,, D.NO. 54-12-13/7/4, PADMAJA RESIDENCY, FLAT NO. 104, BHANU NAGAR,APHB COLONY,
VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, RONGALI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. APPALA NAIDU, AGED 51 YEARS,D.NO. 54-12-13/7/4, PADMAJA RESIDENCY,FLAT NO. 104, BHANU NAGAR,APHB COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI B BALU NAIK, THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, PANCHAYAT RAJ, Z.P.COMPOUND OPPOSITE TO PWD GROUNDS, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA.
3. SRI B PREMAKUMARI, THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND ACCOUNT OFFICER ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. SRI M N HARENDHIRA PRASAD, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT,
NJS,J C.C No.370 of 2026 2
VISAKHAPATNAM.
6. SRI GSS PRASAD, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ (PRI) DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
7. SRI S A K JEELANI, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
3. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA
NJS,J C.C No.370 of 2026 3
The Court made the following Order: At the time of considering the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner states that pending the Contempt Case, the respondents have paid the amounts due to the petitioner. Therefore, requested this Court to close the Contempt Case.
2. Recording the same, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:19.06.2026 Ksj