Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
18.08.2026 Court No.35.
D/L. 8. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (A) 1802 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Habib Mallick
……Petitioner.
Mr. Ranajit Roy
Mr. Indra Prosad Mullick
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Md. Jannat Ul Firdous
…..for the defacto complainant.
Mr. Sankalpa Bhattacharjee
….for the State.
Petitioner has been declared a proclaimed offender as submitted on behalf of the defacto complainant.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits regarding the innocence of the petitioner.
Be that as it may, since the petitioner has been declared proclaimed offender, this application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable.
Accordingly, CRM (A) 1802 of 2026 is dismissed.
2
Photostat copy of the order of the learned ACJM, Basirhat be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)