96 18.08.2026 Ct. No.17 J.Das FAT 2290 of 1989 Sadhan Kr. Chowdhury Vs. UBI & Ors. 1. None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for on their behalf even in the second call. 2. This matter had been appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable. 3. In view of the above, FAT 2290 of 1989 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 4. The Department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith. [Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.] [Rishad Medora, J.]