MAHAVEER PRASAD S/O SHRI RAMAVTAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7152/2018 · 2026-04-20
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3202 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3202 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16676] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7152/2018 Mahaveer Prasad S/o Shri Ramavtar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Shri Mahavir Ji, Ps Shri Mahavirji, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/04/2026
1. By way of filing the instant petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned FIR No.573/2017, registered with Police Station Hindaun, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 420 & 406 IPC.
2. As per the grounds taken in the instant petition, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case and the ingredients of the alleged offence have not made out against the petitioner. Hence, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer and submitted that after thorough investigation in the instant matter, prima facie case was found to be proved against the petitioner and charge- sheet has already been submitted against him and co-accused- Raghuvir under Section 420, 406 & 120B read with Section 34 IPC
[2026:RJ-JP:16676] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7152/2018] on 19.11.2018 before the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hindaun City. Hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is not warranted and the instant petition is liable to be rejected.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Perusal of the impugned FIR and the allegations levelled therein reveals commission of cognizable offence and the correctness of the allegations cannot be examined/adjudicated by this Court at this stage while exercising its powers contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The petitioner is at liberty to take all available grounds and defence which have been taken before this Court, at the appropriate stage of the trial before the Trial Court.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam/38