1 CGHC010315532026 2026:CGHC:37159 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7701 of 2026 Umesh Gorle S/o Late Shri N.L. Gorle Aged About 46 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Budhwari Para, Near Gurudwara, Dongargarh District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Dongargarh District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, G.A. HON'BLE MR. RAMESH SINHA, CHIEF JUSTICE ORDER ON BOARD 19.08.2025 1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has SAURABH YADAV Digitally signed by SAURABH YADAV Date: 2026.08.20 10:58:45 +0530 2 been arrested in connection with Crime No. 377/2025 registered at Police Station - Dongargarh, District: Rajnandgaon, (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 316 (5), 318 (4) and 3 (5) of B.N.S. 2. The First bail application of the applicant being MCRC No. 2136 of 2026 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 25.03.2026 on merits with liberty to proceed and conclude the trial expeditiously. 3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that a written complaint was lodged by the complainant, Shri Rinku Kumar, against the accused, namely Umesh Gorle, a former employee of Axis Bank, Dongargarh, alleging that he had embezzled money from various bank customers. It is alleged that the accused cheated several account holders, namely Chandmal Agarwal (Rs. 31,00,000/-), Moolchand Kosaria (Rs. 3,00,000/-), Tirath Lal Patel (Rs. 15,60,000/-), Balak Das (Rs. 23,12,860/-), and Rashi Pramod Tembhulkar Lohia (Rs. 32,63,668/-), amounting in total to Rs. 1,06,86,528/-. It is further alleged that during the period between November 2022 and April 2025, the accused, while working as a bank employee, committed fraud by sanctioning fake loans in the names of the said customers, illegally transferring money from their accounts, and misappropriating the same for his personal 3 gain. On the basis of the said complaint, the accused was arrested and his memorandum statement was recorded, wherein he disclosed that he used to create net-banking IDs and passwords of customers, withdraw money through cheques, avail overdraft facilities against fixed deposits, and transfer the defrauded amounts to various bank accounts linked to his own accounts. It is also alleged that thereafter he transferred the said amounts from his Axis Bank and SBI accounts to the accounts of his wife, Usha Gorle, and his mother, Taradevi Gorle. The total amount involved in the fraud is stated to be Rs. 5,12,53,480/-. On the basis of the aforesaid complaint, Police have registered Crime No. 377/2025 for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(5), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita against the present applicant and his wife. Hence, the present bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged. It is submitted that although allegations have been made that the applicant’s wife, Usha Gorle, was aware of the transactions in her account, the present applicant had no role in any such transactions, and the entire case against him is based merely 4 on the memorandum of the co-accused, which is not admissible in evidence. It is further submitted that out of the two accused persons, co-accused Usha Gorle has already been granted bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 17.12.2025 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 9480/2025, and on the ground of parity, the present applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. It is contended that the applicant was working as Branch Manager and had sanctioned loans only after due verification of documents by the concerned bank officials, and he had no knowledge of any alleged fraudulent transactions or misappropriation of funds. It is further submitted that the alleged incident pertains to the period from 01.11.2022 to 01.04.2025, whereas the FIR has been lodged on 26.07.2025, reflecting an inordinate and unexplained delay. It is also submitted that the prosecution story is false and concocted, and the FIR has been registered without proper investigation and merely on the basis of baseless allegations, and there is no cogent evidence on record to show that the applicant has received or misappropriated any amount. It is also submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent Court and the present applicant is in jail since 03.08.2025 and conclusion of the trial may take some time, therefore, he prays for grant of regular 5 bail to the present applicant. 5. On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the present case involves a serious economic offence of large-scale financial fraud committed by the applicant, who was working as a bank employee. It is contended that, in compliance of the order passed by this Hon’ble Court dated 10.03.2026, the Investigating Officer has filed an affidavit, wherein it has been specifically stated that the applicant has embezzled an amount of Rs. 1,06,86,528/- from various Axis Bank customers by sanctioning fake loans in their names and illegally transferring funds from their accounts during the period from November 2022 to April 2025. It is further submitted that the memorandum statement of the applicant clearly reveals that he used to create net-banking IDs and passwords of account holders, withdraw money through cheques, avail overdrafts against fixed deposits, and transfer the defrauded amount to multiple bank accounts linked to him. It is also contended that the applicant had routed the said fraudulent amounts to the accounts of his wife, Usha Gorle, and his mother, Tara Devi Gorle, thereby establishing a clear money trail and active involvement of the applicant in the commission of the offence. Considering the nature and 6 gravity of the allegations, the huge amount involved, and the specific role attributed to the applicant, therefore, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 6. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations, the material available on record, and the fact that the applicant’s first bail application was rejected on merits vide order dated 25.03.2026 passed in MCRC No. 2136 of 2026, and no new ground has been raised in the present second bail application, this Court is of the opinion that, in view of the seriousness of the allegations, the magnitude of the alleged fraud amounting to Rs. 5,12,53,480/-, and the specific role attributed to the applicant, as reflected from the material collected during the investigation, this is not a fit case for enlarging the applicant on regular bail. 8. Accordingly, the second bail application of the applicant – Umesh Gorle, involved in Crime No. 377/2025 registered at Police Station - Dongargarh, District: Rajnandgaon, (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 316 (5), 318 (4) and 3 (5) of B.N.S, is rejected. 9. However, this Court hopes and trusts that the trial Court shall 7 make an earnest endeavour to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible within a period of six months from the receipt of a certified copy of this order in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 10. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Saurabh