Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32011 (CHH)

ARUN KUMAR AGRAWAL v. SMT. USHA AGRAWAL

WP227/966/2026 · 2026-08-11

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010293352026 2026:CGHC:35755 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 966 of 2026 1 - Arun Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Jyoti Prasad Agrawal, Aged About 58 Years R/o. Village - Pathalgaon, Tahsil - Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Usha Agrawal W/o Shri Shyamla Agrawal, Aged About 52 Years Occupation- House Wife, Permanent R/o. Village - Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.), Presently R/o. B-903, Salpuria, Sattva Melody, Mysore Road (Wrongly Mentioned As New Delhi In The Impugned Order Dated 10-07-20206, Passed By 2nd D J Kunkuri), P. O. Government Electric Factory, Suburban District - Bengaluru South, District - Bengaluru (Karnataka), Through Her General Power Of Attorney Holder, Shri Satish Kumar Jindal, S/o. Late Shri Rameshwardas Agrawal, Aged About- 62 Years, R/o. Madhav Department Stores, Ambikapur Road, Pathalgaon, Tahsil- Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur (C.G.). 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Jashpur, District - Jashpur (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2026.08.13 16:48:40 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent No.2 Mr. Ashutosh Trivedi, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 12/08/2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor any representation is made despite repeated calls. On 31.07.2026, when the notices were issued, fixed date was given for hearing of the case however, on repeated calls no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge