CRWP-8619 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 126 PARAMPAL SINGH STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Present: SURYA PARTAP directions to the respondent 2. the petitione respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within 3. 8619-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PARAMPAL SINGH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Didar Singh, Advocate for PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to the respondents No.4 to 7. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within Notice of motion to respondents No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8619-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 20.07.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. . as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation (Annexure P-4) before earned counsel prays for directions to the respondent to decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time. to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that ) before the respondent stipulated time. GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.21 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8619 4. notice on upon the State is hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. 20.07.2026 Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 8619-2026 (O&M) 2 notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. .2026 (SURYA P Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No accepts No.1 to 3/State. Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE :Yes/No : Yes/No accepts Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.21 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document