Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.23. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (M) 838 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Farakka Police Station case no. 251 of 2025 dated 29.06.2025 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Mohan Roy.
……Petitioner. Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Ms. Sagnika Banerjee Ms. Sarmistha Basak
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Ld. APP Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner surrendered before the jurisdictional Court on 28th of January, 2026 and since then he is in custody. Charge-sheet has already been submitted, as such there being no scope for the trial to be concluded, petitioner may be released on bail. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State produces the Case Diary, refers to the medical documents which includes the injury report, medical prescriptions and subsequent treatment including the opinion of the doctors. I have also taken into account the statement of the injured. Prima facie, a case has been made out. However, having considered that some time will be required to take the trial to its logical conclusion. On stringent conditions, I am inclined to release the
2 petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, the petitioner, namely, Mohan Roy shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned Court. Additionally, petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Farakka Police Station till the evidence of the vulnerable witnesses are over. Thus, CRM (M) No. 838 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)