- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010536652017 NC: 2026:KHC:39688 RSA No. 2381 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2381 OF 2017(DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT NINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS W/O LATE THIMMAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HER LR’S 1(a) SMT.LAKSHMAMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O CHANNARAYAPPA R/AT HALENIJAGAL NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT -562 123 1(b) SMT.CHIKKAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS W/O N.HANUMANTHEGOWDA R/AT NO.3521, 7TH MAIN, C BLOCK GAYATHRINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 021 2. SRI VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE THIMMAIAH BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NIMBENAHALLI, DODDABELE POST, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123 …APPELLANTS [BY SRI A.SAMPATH, ADVOCATE FOR A1(a) & (b) AND A2] Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010536652017 NC: 2026:KHC:39688 RSA No. 2381 of 2017 AND: 1. SRI KANAKARAJU AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O NAGALINGAIAH 2. SRI CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O NAGALINGAIAH SINCE DEAD ON 17.03.2016 REPRESENTED BY LR’S BY ORDER DATED 10.12.2019 2(a) RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR 2(b) ASHA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR 2(c) CHAITRA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR 2(d) DIVYA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR 2(e) VARALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR ALL ARE RESIDING AT NIMBENAHALLI VILLAGE NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 132 - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010536652017 NC: 2026:KHC:39688 RSA No. 2381 of 2017 3. SRI PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O NAGALINGAIAH 4. SRI BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O NAGALINGAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LR 4(a) SMT.BHAGYALAKSHMI W/O BASAVARAJU AGED MAJOR NO.11/1, 2ND MAIN ARABHA HALLI BENGALURU – 560 026. 4(b) YASHAS B S/O BASAVARAJU NO.11/1, 2ND MAIN ARABHA HALLI BENGALURU – 560 026. 5 SRI SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O NAGALINGAIAH ALL ARE RESIDING AT NIMBENAHALLI, DODDABELE POST, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI SURESH.G.V, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2(A TO E), R3, R5, R4(A) AND R4(B)] THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.08.2017 PASSED IN RA NO.26/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, DISMISSING THE - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010536652017 NC: 2026:KHC:39688 RSA No. 2381 of 2017 APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.03.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.133/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, NELAMANGALA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Parties are present. 2. Fifth respondent is represented by third respondent as a Special Power of Attorney holder. 3. Appellant No.2 is represented by appellant No.1 (a) and (b) as a General Power of Attorney holder. 4. Parties present a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure signed by the parties and their respective Advocates along with survey sketch. 5. Contents of the compromise petition is read over to the parties and they admit that the terms of the compromise petition depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out terms of compromise. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010536652017 NC: 2026:KHC:39688 RSA No. 2381 of 2017 6. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 7. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) Compromise petition is accepted. (ii) Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (iii) Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition and sketch as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73