Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32 (CAL)

MONORANJAN MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/89/2026 · 2026-01-30

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30.01.2026 Sl. No. DL 48 Court No. 35 Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. CRM (M) 89 of 2026 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Mallarpur Police Station case no.194 of 2025 dated 07.07.2025 under Sections 103(1), 238(a) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. -AND- In the matter of : MONORANJAN MONDAL ……Petitioner For the Petitioner : Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Advocate Mr. Arnab Kr. Neogi Mr. Surajit Saha Mr. Sourav Samanta Mr. Ritam Dutta …Advocates For the State : Mr. Madhusudan Sur, APP Mr. Ashok Das …Advocates For the De facto complainant : Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dan …Advocate 1. Learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this application and would prefer the bail application after receipt of the documents under Section 230 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 2. Learned advocate for the State on the other hand submits that the bail prayer of the other accused has been rejected very recently. Page 2 3. Having considered the prayer advanced on behalf of the petitioner, the instant bail application being CRM(M) 89 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. 4. All parties shall act on the basis of server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 5. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )