- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291102019 NC: 2026:KHC:39558-DB WP No. 43481 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO.43481 OF 2019 (KLGP) BETWEEN: SRI MOHAMMED KAIZER @ KHAWJA, S/O MOHAMAD MUSTAK, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/A SHAHINSHA NAGAR, KOLAR - 563 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KARIYAPPA B.S., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. VANAJAKSHI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE WAKF OFFICER, KOLAR, HUB ALI SHAH COMPLEX, NEAR CLOCK TOWER, KOLAR - 563 101. 3. MUTHAWALLI, HAZRATH AZMATHULLA SHAKHADRI MAKAN, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291102019 NC: 2026:KHC:39558-DB WP No. 43481 of 2019 SHAHINSHA NAGAR, KOLAR - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA FOR R1, MS. SWATHI ASHOK, ADVOCATE FOR R2, SRI. MOHAMMED TIPPU SULTAN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARITCLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN L.G.C.(G) NO.379/2019 ON THE FILE OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURUWHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-J SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) This writ petition was filed way back in the year 2019. The order sheet would disclose that despite the matter having been listed several times, adjournments have been taken on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant. Initially, the interim order was granted way back on 25.10.2019 and from the next date of hearing, the interim order has not been extended. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291102019 NC: 2026:KHC:39558-DB WP No. 43481 of 2019 2. Today, when the matter is listed again, there is a request for adjournment, which we refused in the first call. Now again in the second call, there is a request for adjournment. 3. Considering the adjournments already taken on each and every date after 25.10.2019, we decline to adjourn the matter. As the learned counsel for the appellant is not arguing the matter, we dismiss this appeal for non prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35 ct-vn