Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6735 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-670 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sunil Kumar @ Sachin Kumar, S/O Wakil Sahani @ Vakil Sahni @ Vakil Sahani, Resident of village - Madhubani Ghat,P.S- Muffasil, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.670 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(6), 310(5), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111, 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of this petitioner, one country made pistol and a mobile were recovered and from his house, three bikes were recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6735 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. As far as the bikes are concerned, the petitioner is a mechanic and the bikes were given to him for some repair. He is having no knowledge whether the bikes are stolen or not. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. He is languishing in judicial custody since 16.10.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 670 of 2025.
lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T