IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CRM-M-21816-2026 Date of decision: 21st July, 2026 Bijender @ Vijender Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Fresh custody certificate filed by learned State counsel is taken on record. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter having been passed over twice. Even on the last date of hearing, none has appeared on his behalf. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 3. Since the main petition has been dismissed for non-prosecution, pending application(s), if any, stand rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 21st July, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.21 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document