Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31978 (PNJ)

MANINDER PAL SINGH @ MANINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/13447/2026 · 2026-07-16

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-13447-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (287) CRM-M-13447-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.07.2026 MANINDER PAL SINGH @ MANINDER SINGH AND OTHERS … Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Ravisha Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG Punjab. Ms. Yukti Garg, Advocate for the respondent/complainant. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (Section 482 CrPC) for quashing of FIR No.22 dated 12.01.2022 under Sections 408, 381, 420 and 120-B (Section 409 IPC added later on) registered at P.S. Division-B, Police Commissionerate Amritsar, District Amritsar and all susbsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.09.2024 (P-2). 2. A perusal of the compromise shows that one of the accused, namely Varinder Singh, is not a party to the compromise. Since, the compromise is only partial, FIR cannot be quashed. As such, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail of an appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 16th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.21 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13447-2026 (O&M) 2 POONAM 2026.07.21 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document