Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31975 (PNJ)

MANGU RAM v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA

CWP/22176/2026 · 2026-07-21

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CWP-22176-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.07.2026 Mangu Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Raje Ram Kaushik and Mr. Yojit Kaushik, Advocates for the petitioner Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer only for directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 02.07.2026, Annexure P-6, submitted for release of retiral benefits, in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 02.07.2026 expeditiously, in accordance with law, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 21.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.21 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document