Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31974 (KAR)

FAZLUL HASSAN ZAHID v. SRIKANTH SEETHARAM

MFA/4027/2025 · 2026-07-28

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010348532025 NC: 2026:KHC:39492 MFA No. 4027 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4027 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. FAZLUL HASSAN ZAHID AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SON OF LATE S. BASHEER-UL-HASSAN, PRESTIGE PUBLIC SCHOOL, OFFICE T.P. NO. 985, 2ND CROSS, A.K. COLONY, B.S.A. ROAD CROSS, BANGALORE - 560 005. 2. PRESTIGE PUBLIC SCHOOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CLASSES OLD NO. 62, 2ND CROSS, A.K. COLONY, B.S.A. ROAD CROSS, BANGALORE - 560 005. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ABDUL WAJID S.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRIKANTH SEETHARAM AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SON OF LATE L. SEETHARAM, 2. SATISH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF LATE L. SEETHARAM, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010348532025 NC: 2026:KHC:39492 MFA No. 4027 of 2025 NO.135, 6TH CROSS, PILLANNA GARDEN, 1ST STAGE, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE - 560 084. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT.07.04.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.6 IN O.S.NO.3390/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CCH NO. 3, ALLOWING THE IA.NO. 6 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is present. 2. This appeal is preferred by the appellants challenging the order passed on IA.No.6 filed under Section 151 CPC in O.S.No.3390/2019 by the XV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. 3. Registry has raised objection with regard to maintainability of the appeal. The objection so raised is - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010348532025 NC: 2026:KHC:39492 MFA No. 4027 of 2025 sustained. The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 4. Liberty is reserved to the appellants to move the appropriate forum for appropriate relief. The time spent herein shall be condoned, if any such proceedings are filed. 5. Certified copies of the documents produced shall be returned to the learned counsel for the appellants. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6