Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31971 (PNJ)

ADITI GARG v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/38986/2026 · 2026-07-20

N S Shekhawat

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

169 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38986-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 Aditi Garg …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Petitioner in person. Mr.M.S.Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present pettion under Section 482/483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 528/529 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) with a prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 12.02.2026 (Annexure P-9) passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana and the impugned order dated 06.11.2019 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana, whereby, the petition under Section 133 /144 of Cr.P.C. moved by the petitioner was ordered to be dismissed. 2. From the record, it is apparent that the petitioner had filed the main petition (Annexure P-1) under Sections 133/144 of Cr.P.C. on 06.03.2018 against the respondents by alleging that the respondents were constructing a house at plot No.39, Central Town, Phullanwal-Threeke Road, Village Dad, P.S. Sadar, Ludhiana and were causing obsruction to movement of pedestrian general public and public vehicles by placing construction materials on HEMLATA 2026.07.21 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-38986-2026 -2- roadsides and over road also. It was further alleged that the respondents were further causing obstruction to passage of public vehicles and pedestrians by parking of their vehicles on road during unloading of construction material from time to time. 3. During the course of hearing, the petitioner has appeared in person and admitted that the respondents have already constructed their house and consequently, there was no obstruction on the passage for the movement of general public and vehicles. 4. Since nothing survives in the present petition, the petition is ordered to be dismissed. The petitioner would be at liberty to avail her alternative remedies, if any, in accordance with law. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 20.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.07.21 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document