Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31965 (MAD)

Navaneethamurugan v. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul,

WP Crl.(MD)/2748/2026 · 2026-06-03

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2748 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2748 of 2026 Navaneethamurugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2. State of Tamilnadu, Rep by Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. Veerasamy 4. Rajkumar 5. Nallathambhi ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to give adequate police protection to worship and conduct poojas on all auspicious occasions at Sivalinga Avudai under the 30 yrs old vilva tree near village Manthai at Senkurichi via, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 27.04.2026. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2748 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manikandan For Respondents : Mr.S.Arun Arockiasamy (R1 & R2) Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) Mr.C.Prithiriraj (R3 to R5) ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to give adequate police protection to worship and conduct poojas on all auspicious occasions at Sivalinga Avudai under 30 yrs old vilva tree near village Manthai at Senkurichi via, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 27.04.2026. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that, thus far, the respondent police has not received any representation from the petitioner as claimed in the writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either sides and carefully perused the materials available on record. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondents, notice to them is dispensed with. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2748 of 2026 4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate and granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondent police, this writ petition stands disposed of. 03.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm TO:- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2. State of Tamilnadu, Rep by Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2748 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2748 of 2026 Dated 03.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis