Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31961 (KAR)

M/S. CHILDRENS EDUCATION SOCIETY (REGD.) v. SMT. SUBBALAKSHMAMMA

MFA/9528/2025 · 2026-07-28

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010819522025 NC: 2026:KHC:39494 MFA No. 9528 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9528 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. CHILDRENS EDUCATION SOCIETY (REGD.) A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 30TH MAIN, 1ST PHASE, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN SRI. S.N.V.L. NARASIMHA RAJU …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. MAYA HOLLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SUBBALAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, D/O LATE GOWRAMMA, RESIDING AT INDALAVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 106. REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI. VENKATAPATHI, S/O LATE. VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.43, IV CROSS, P.R.LAYOUT, B.G.ROAD, LAKKAKKASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 030. Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010819522025 NC: 2026:KHC:39494 MFA No. 9528 of 2025 2. SMT.RAMAKKA D/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS, 3. SRI.SAMPANNA, S/O LATE ERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS, 4. SRI. S. SAMPAIAH, S/O SAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 5. SMT. SAROJAMMA, W/O SRI.SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 6. SRI. SAMPATH S/O SRI.SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 7. SRI. S.MANJUNATH S/O SRI. SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 8. MISS. S.SUMA D/O SRI.SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 9. MISS. LATHA, D/O SRI. SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010819522025 NC: 2026:KHC:39494 MFA No. 9528 of 2025 10. SRI. S.BHADRAPPA, S/O SRI.SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 11. SMT. RATHNAMMA, W/O SRI. BHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 12. SRI. PRABHU, S/O SRI.BHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 13. SRI. LOKESH, S/O SRI. BHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 14. SRI. SHIVRAJ, S/O SRI.BHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 15. SMT. PUSHPALATHA D/O SRI.BHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 16. SRI. SHIVARAJAPPA, S/O SRI.SAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 17. SMT. NAGALAKSHMI W/O SRI.SHIVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 18. SMT. PREMA, D/O SRI. SHIVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010819522025 NC: 2026:KHC:39494 MFA No. 9528 of 2025 19. SRI. HARISH, S/O SRI.SHIVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 20. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, S/O SRI. SAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 21. SMT. BHAGYAMMA, W/O SRI.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 22. SRI. GIRISH, S/O SRI.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 23. MISS. ASHA, D/O SRI.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 24. SRI. SRINIVAS S/O SRI.SAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 25. SMT. REVAMMA W/O SRI.SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 26. MISS. ANITHA D/O SRI. SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 27. SMT. RATHNAMMA D/O SRI. SAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010819522025 NC: 2026:KHC:39494 MFA No. 9528 of 2025 RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 27 ARE RESIDING AT HARAGADDE VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 105. 28. SRI. BHARATH JAGANNATHAN, S/O LATE M.JAGANNATHAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 29. SMT. SELVE JAGANNATHAN W/O LATE M. JAGANNATHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 30. SMT. MENAKA KUMAR D/O LATE M. JAGANNATHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.28 TO 30 ARE RESIDING AT NO.H-35, AVALAPALLI HUDCO, HOSUR - 635 109. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.01.2023 PASSED ON I.A.NOs. 1 AND 2 IN OS.NO. 26/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, ALLOWING THE I.A.NOs.1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010819522025 NC: 2026:KHC:39494 MFA No. 9528 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the present appeal may not survive for consideration in view of subsequent events that have occurred. 2. Placing the memo and submission on record, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. In view of dismissal of this appeal, pending application, if any, would pale into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18