1 CGHC010250092026 2026:CGHC:34451 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3413 of 2026 1 - Vasudev Singh S/o Late Jai Singh Thakur, Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Siloda, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Jitendra Singh S/o Late Jai Singh Thakur, Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Siloda, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Kaushik Singh Thakur S/o Late Jai Singh Thakur, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Siloda, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 4 - Ramesh Singh Thakur S/o Late Jai Singh Thakur, Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Siloda, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 5 - Lavkush Singh Thakur S/o Late Jai Singh Thakur, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Siloda, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Sunita Rajput, W/o Rishi Kumar Rajput, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Siloda, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU Date: 2026.08.06 18:47:55 +0530 2 2 - Collector Durg District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Durg District Durg (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Durg District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is downloaded from CIS Periphery.) For Petitioner : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate. For State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/08/2026 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to Constitute a high level demarcation team for demarcation of land of petitioners and thereafter further be pleased to direct the respondent no. 4 to decide the pending revenue case No. 202207103000062- A/6A year 2021-22 (P/2) after receiving the demarcation report of high level demarcation team within stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court considering the facts that the above case is pending since 19.07.2022 before the respondent no. 4. 10.2 This Hon'ble court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner's matter. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour 3 of the petitioner. An affidavit is filed herewith in support of this petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Revenue Case No. 202207103000062, filed for correction of the map and area relating to the concerned Khasra Nos., has been pending adjudication before the Tahsildar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) since the year 2021–2022 and remains undecided till date. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that since the matter relates to the year 2021–2022, the same may have already been decided by the concerned authority. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds that the grievance of the petitioner is confined to the pendency of Revenue Case No. 202207103000062, which is stated to be pending consideration before the learned Tahsildar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) since the year 2021–2022. Since the proceedings are stated to be pending for a considerable period and no adjudication appears to have taken place till date, this Court deems it appropriate to issue a direction for expeditious consideration and disposal of the said proceedings. 5. Accordingly, the concerned Tahsildar, namely, Tahsildar, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), is directed to verify the status of the aforesaid revenue case and, if the same has not already been decided, to proceed further and decide the matter on its own 4 merits, in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of either of the parties, and the concerned authority shall decide the matter independently in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. 7. With this observation and direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju