158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3738-2026 Date of Decision: July 21, 2026 Sumer Singh …Pe00oner Versus Gyasi Ram and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Present revision peon is filed against the order dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Palwal, whereby Civil Appeal No.CA-48 of 2025, as filed by the peoner, tled as “Sumer Singh v. Gyasi Ram and others” was dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Learned counsel for the peoner submits that the peoner had not authorized his counsel to withdraw the appeal. 3. A1er going through the paper book, this Court does not find any merit in the aforesaid contenon. 4. It is revealed that on 26.08.2025, appellant (peoner herein) had moved an applicaon for withdrawal. The ma6er was adjourned to 30.09.2025. Therea1er, statement was made by the counsel for the peoner that he did not want of proceed further with the appeal and so, withdrew the same. No affidavit of the counsel for the appellant, who appeared before the Appellate Court, is placed on record before this Court to submit that authority was not given to him to withdraw the appeal. 5. In view of above, this Court does not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-3). As such, finding the present peon held to be devoid of any merit and the same is hereby dismissed. July 21, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.07.21 16:57 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order