Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31942 (CAL)

AAA REPD BY ITS MOTHER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/1620/2026 · 2026-07-31

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31/07/2026 D/L – 31 Court No.35 S. Kundu C.R.M.(A) 1620 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Gazole P.S. Case No. 458 of 2026 dated 14/05/2026 under sections 137(2) of the BNS. In the matter of: AAA …Petitioner. Mr. Kalidas Saha Mr. Pikesh Kr. Chauhan …for the petitioner. Mr. Pritam Ray Ms. Nayana Mukherjee …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case and the facts have been distorted as there was an existing relationship between the petitioner and the victim. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary. The statement of the victim in Section 183 of the BNSS reflects that complicity of the present petitioner and the victim was also recovered from the house of the petitioner. Having considered the overall circumstances, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, CRM(A) 1620 of 2026 is dismissed. 2 Pending application, if any, is disposed of accordingly. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)