Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3194 (PAT)

Sriram Rajwar @ Shree Ram v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./26077/2026 · 2026-04-22

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26077 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2025 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sriram Rajwar @ Shree Ram S/o Late Ramdeni Rajwar @ Ramdeni Ram Resident of village - Koidih P.S - Tilauthu, District - Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, 200 liters illicit liquor kept in sack and one motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR26-B- 0870 in which some sack were tied, were recovered from place of occurrence. Local chowkidar disclosed that petitioner along with two other co-accused persons fled away from the spot. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the seized Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26077 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/3 vehicle and he has no concern with the seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Except the disclosure statement of local chowkidar, there is nothing material against the petitioner. Although, petitioner has got three criminal antecedents but only one case belongs to Excise Act. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court concerned within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-2, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 322 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with further condition:- (i) Petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation and trial and shall remain present on each and every date during trial Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26077 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 3/3 and in his absence on two consecutive dates, the trial court is at liberty to cancel his bail bond. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T