Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31910 (CAL)

NANIGOPAL SARKAR AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1634/2026 · 2026-07-31

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 38. Kausik CRM (A) 1634 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Nanigopal Sarkar & Anr. ……Petitioners. Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee Mr. Mahiul Islam ……for the Petitioners. Mr. Kalidas Saha ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to proceed with the present anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1634 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)