Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M No.29169 of 2026 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 224 *****
CRM-M No.29169 of 2026 Date of decision : 21.7.2026 Date of uploading : 21.7.2026
Chintu
………….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana
…….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Maneet Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana
--- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
1. On 21.5.2026, the following order was passed: ‘Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.446 dated 27.11.2025, under Sections 110, 190, 191(2), 333 and 351(3) BNS, 2023 (sections 308, 149, 148, 452, 506 IPC), (Later on added sections 109, 351(2) BNS, 2023) (sections 307, 506 IPC), Police Station City Gohana, District Sonepat; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, claims parity with co-accused— Lakhan, who has been afforded the concession of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 18.05.2025 passed in CRM-M-20912-2026 (Annexure P-3) & the petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein as per law. Notice of motion. On the strength of advance notice; Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG, Haryana has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana. Adjourned to 21.07.2026. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 26.05.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.07.21 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M No.29169 of 2026 -2-
investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.’
2. Learned State counsel (on instructions) submits that pursuant to the order dated 21.5.2026, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation.
3. In view of the above, the instant petition is allowed. Interim
order dated 21.5.2026, passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS.
4. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence.
5. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS or upon showing any other sufficient cause.
6. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE 21.7.2026 Ashwanii
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.07.21 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document