1 CGHC010308442026 2026:CGHC:36220 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6159 of 2026 Devendra Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Moti Lal Gupta Aged About 58 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator, Bharatpur District Manendragarh, Chirmiri Bharatpur C. G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur C. G. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction (DPI), Indravati Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur C. G. 3 - Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, District Korea C. G. 4 - Mission / Managing Director Samagra, Shiksha Abhiyan (Formerly SSA ) Raipur C. G. 5 - District Project Coordinator, Samagra, Shiksha, District Manendragarh, Chirmiri Bharatpur C. G. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Ojha, Advocate SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.08.14 18:44:24 +0530 2 For Respondents/ State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.4 & 5: Mr. Anadi Sharma, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 14/08/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, who is working in the department of respondents/Samagra Shiksha is seeking a direction towards the respondents authorities to regularize his services on the post of Block Resource Coordinator (BRC). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in continuous service since 17.01.1996, i.e., for nearly three decades. It is further submitted that the concerned department has already sought the approval and concurrence of the Finance Department for the regularization of the petitioner. However, the petitioner’s claim/representation for regularization has not yet been decided by the competent authority. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as respondent Nos. 4 & 5 submit that, if the petitioner’s claim/representation (Annexure P-3) is still pending before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to 3 the respondent authorities to consider and decide the petitioner’s claim/representation by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar/ Ashu