Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010503342026 NC: 2026:KHC:39028 WP No. 22817 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.22817 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. M. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE N.MUNI REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
2.
SRI. M. SRIDHAR S/O LATE.N.MUNI REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT.NO.5, KUMBENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, KADUGODI POST BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE-560067.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENKATARAMI REDDY .E, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560009.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010503342026 NC: 2026:KHC:39028 WP No. 22817 of 2026
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD BENGALURU-560009.
4.
THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560036.
5.
SMT. TULASAMMA W/O. LATE NARAYANI @ NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT.KUMBENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE KADUGODI POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE EAST, BANGALORE-560067.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 13-11-2025 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT AT BANGALORE DISTRICT IN R.P.NO.681/2025 VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010503342026 NC: 2026:KHC:39028 WP No. 22817 of 2026
2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 13.11.2025 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2 - Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District, Bengaluru, in R.P.No.681/2025.
3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned orders passed by the respondent - Authorities, it is evident that the petitioners are seeking entry in the revenue records in terms of the registered sale deed dated 27.03.1968 after an inordinate delay of nearly 58 years.
4. In that view of the matter, taking into
consideration the fact that, katha has not been sought by the father of the petitioner, after purchasing the same during 1968, I am of the view that no interference is called for in this petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010503342026 NC: 2026:KHC:39028 WP No. 22817 of 2026
Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to establish their rights over the property in question in the manner known to law. Sd/-
(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35