1 CGHC010299002026 2026:CGHC:34051 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1104 of 2026 1 - Vrindawati Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samuh Sankra Through Its President Smt. Kumudani Sahu President Aged About 50 Years Namely Smt, Kumudani Sahu Aged About 50 Years W/o Minketan Sahu R/o Village Sankra, Police Station And Tehsil Sariya District Sarangarh Bilaigarh, C.G. Mo. No. 83193996262 2 - Secretary Namely Smt, Padminee Pradhan Aged About 35 Years, W/o Jagannath Pradhan R/o Village Sankra, Police Station, And Tehsil Sariya, District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh C.G Mo. No. 7898508655 ... Petitioner(s) versus Umesh Sahu Sub Divisional O6cer, Sarangarh District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri R.K. Agrawal, Advocate SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.08.05 17:14:49 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 05.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 14.07.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 3654 of 2026 was orally communicated to the respondent. It is contended that despite having knowledge of the said order, the Sub-Divisional O6cer (SDO), without waiting for the certi?ed/uploaded copy of the order and without adhering to the directions and observations made by this Court, proceeded with the revenue proceedings and passed the ?nal order on 15.07.2026. 2. The submission made on behalf of the petitioner has been considered. However, no documentary material has been placed on record to establish that the order of this Court had been communicated to the SDO prior to the passing of the order dated 15.07.2026. Mere assertion regarding oral communication, in the absence of any supporting material, is insu6cient to infer that the respondent had knowledge of the order of this Court. In such circumstances, it cannot be presumed that the SDO, while passing the order dated 3 15.07.2026 in e-Court Case No. 202606320600012/B-121/2025- 26, acted in deliberate or willful disobedience of the order of this Court. Since the essential ingredient of willful disobedience is not made out, no case for initiating contempt proceedings is established. 3. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Shoaib