Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3189 (JHR)

SANDIP KUMAR PANDEY ALIAS PINTU PANDEY ALLIAS SANDEEP KUMAR PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1345/2026 · 2026-04-07

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9945 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1345 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1345 of 2026 ---- Sandip Kumar Pandey @ Pintu Pandey @ Sandeep Kumar Pandey, aged about 40 years, son of Ashok Kumar Pandey, resident of Khanudih, Baghmara, PO – Nadkhurki, PS – Khanudih and District - Dhanbad .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mrs. Shristi Sinha, Advocate :- Mr. Shashank Shekhar No.1, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate ---- 02/07.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No.0065 of 2022 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 353, 337, 338, 379, 427, 447, 504, 506 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, Section 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, Rule 7/9/13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Rule, 2017 and Section 27 of Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are allegations against 90 to 100 persons of entering into the 2026:JHHC:9945 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1345 of 2026 siding gate of Railway and they were trying to take coal. She further submits that in identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA Nos.2657 of 2024, 2668 of 2024, 6713 of 2023, 1165 of 2026 and 6751 of 2023. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of forcefully entering into the siding gate of railway. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against 90 to 100 persons of entering into the siding gate of railway and in identical situation co- accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABAs and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 07.04.2026 Sangam/