1 CGHC010303002026 2026:CGHC:36712-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2161 of 2026 Akhilesh Chaudhary S/o Shri Bharat Kumar Chaudhary, R/o A /23/7,/s. S. Nagar, Amboli Road, Near M. V. M. School, Andheri West, Mumbai, District Brihan Mumbai, Maharashtra. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Kirandu, District Dantewada (C.G.) 2. Gaurav Kumar Soni S/o Shri Dharmendra Kumar Soni, R/o Ward No. 08, Main Market, Kirandul, Police Station Kirandu, District Dantewada (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shyama Prasad Sannat, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Anusha Naik, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 18.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Shyama Prasad Sannat, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.08.18 15:08:12 +0530 2 heard Ms. Anusha Naik, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “a. Quash FIR No. 0008/2026 dated 03.02.2026 registered at Police Station Kirandul, District Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 together with all consequential criminal proceedings arising therefrom; b. Accept and take on record the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No. 2; c. Pass any other or further order(s) which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.” 3. Upon perusal of the present petition, it transpires that the same suffers from the defects/defaults pointed out by the Registry of this Court. The petition was filed on 03.08.2026 and, despite lapse of considerable time, the said defects have not been cured. This reflects that the petitioner has pursued the petition in a casual manner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer so made. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- for having filed the petition in a casual manner and for not 3 removing the defects till date, thereby causing wastage of the valuable time of the Court. The aforesaid amount shall be deposited by the petitioner before the Registry of this Court, and the receipt thereof shall be produced at the time of filing the fresh petition, if any. The amount so deposited shall be transmitted to the Government Disabled College, Mana Camp, Raipur (C.G.). 6. Certified copies of the documents, if any, be returned to the petitioner after retaining photocopies thereof. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan