Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31876 (CAL)

SUNITI KUMAR GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/8237/2026 · 2026-07-28

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28.07.2026 ML Item No.1183 Ct. No.5 KS W.P.A. 8237 of 2026 Mr. Suniti Kumar Ghosh Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Suryaneel Das, Ld. A.G.P. Ms. Suchitra Sinha Chatterjee Mr. Chiranjit Pal …..For the State 1. At the time of call no one appears for the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for. 2. State respondents are represented by the learned advocates. 3. From record it appears on 9th April, 2026, accommodation was prayed for on behalf of the petitioner. Prayer of the petitioner was allowed thereby directing the learned advocate for the petitioner to complete service of notice. 4. It appears petitioner has lost interest. 5. Writ petition stands dismissed for default. 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)