MANIRUL SK @ MANIRUL ISLAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (NDPS)/1739/2026 · 2026-08-01
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31864 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31864 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
01.08.2026 Court No.35.
D/L. 220. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (NDPS) 1739 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 77/2026 dated 21.01.2026 under Section 21(C)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Manirul Sk @ Manirul Islam
……Petitioner.
Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick
……for the Petitioner.
Dr. Pradip Banerjee Mr. Sayan Mukherjee
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested in January, 2026 and since then he is in custody. The subject matter of the case relate to alleged recovery of 50 bottles of Phensedyl. Charge sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. As such, the petitioner prays for bail.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that another case being Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 145 of 2024 is pending against the petitioner.
Report submitted by the State reflects that, in respect of absconding accused person, warrant of arrest has been issued and the case is pending. Prosecution has relied upon 6 witnesses in order to prove its case.
2
Having considered that there is no prospect of the trial commencing very soon, as a matter of last chance, the petitioner is afforded liberty in view of the antecedent of the petitioner.
Having regard to the observations made above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Manirul Sk @ Manirul Islam shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Judge, under NDPS Act, 3rd Court, Malda. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Malda without the prior permission of the learned Special Court.
Thus, CRM (NDPS) 1739 of 2026 is allowed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)