APHC010255992026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14426/2026 Between: 1. MODUGULA VASANTHAMMA, W/O. M. SUDHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. CHINNARALASAPURAM VILLAGE, PUNGANURU MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT, (NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT)-517247 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI-522238. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT-517001. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AT MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT-517325. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUNGANURU POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT-517247. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not the petitioners representation Dt.21.04.2026 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider petitioners representation Dt.21.04.2026, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to consider my representation Dt.21.04.2026 pending the writ petition in this Hon'ble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. YANAGUNURU SHASHANK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14426/2026 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “……..declaring the inaction of the respondents in not the petitioners representation Dt.21.04.2026 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider petitioners representation Dt.21.04.2026, and to pass.…….” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to work-out his remedies available in Law. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is present. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by reserving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 19.06.2026 GVK 4 259 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No: 14426 of 2026 Date: 19.06.2026 GVK