Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31856 (CHH)

INDUSIND BANK v. THE TEHSILDAR

WPC/5027/2024 · 2026-08-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010340602024 2026:CGHC:35724 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5027 of 2024 1 - Indusind Bank Having Its Registered Office At 2401 Ge Thimmaya Road, Pune (Maharashra) 411001 Acting Through Its Authorized Officer, Shri Manpreet Singh S/o Shri Inder Singh, Designated As Assistant Vice President, Having Address At 499 Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, New Delhi 110034 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Tehsildar Raipur Chhattisgarh, 492001. 2 - M/s Bhalla Rolling Shutter Having Address At Near Prakash Garage, Station Road, Raipur (C.G.) 492001, Also At - Municipal House No. 13, Naya Plot No. 4, P.H. No. 106 A, Kelkar Para Ward, Mauja, Raipur Khas, Raipur (C.G.) 492001. 3 - Shri Inderpal Singh Bhalla Having Address At Near Prakash Garage, Station Road Raipur (C.G.) 492001, Also At Municipal House No. 13, Naya Plot No. 4, P.H. No. 106 A, Kelkar Para Ward, Mauja, Raipur Khas, Raipur (C.G.) 492001. 4 - Smt. Harpuneet Kaur Having Address At Bawa Niwas Nahar Para, Kelkar Badi, Opposite Neelkanthewar Mandir, Raipur (C.G.) 492001, Also At Municipal House No. 13, Naya Plot No. 4, P.H. No. 106 A, Kelkar Para Ward, Mauja - Raipur Khas, Raipur (C.G.) 492001. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 5 - Satwant Kaur Having Address - At Bawa Niwas, Nahar Para, Kelkar Badi, Opposite Neelkanthewar Mandir, Raipur (C.G.), 492001, Also At Municipal House No. 13, Naya Plot No. 4, P.H. No. 106 A, Kelkar Para Ward, Mauja - Raipur Khas, Raipur (C.G.) 492001. 6 - Balijeet Singh Bhalla Having Address At Bawa Niwas, Nahar Para, Kelkar Badi, Opposite Neelkanthewar Mandir, Raipur (C.G.), 492001, Also At Municpal House No. 13, Naya Plot No. 4, P.H. No. 106 A Kelkar Para Ward, Mauja - Raipur Khas, Raipur (C.G.) 492001 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Verma, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 12/08/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “i. To kindly direct the respondent no.1 The Tehsildar, to comply the order dated 03/11/2023 passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Raipur and assist the petitioner bank in taking peaceful physical possession of the mortgaged property preferably within a period of 30 days. ii. To kindly make any other order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat