SK SAHIDUL @ SAIDUL @ SK SAIDUL ISLAM AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM (A)/1596/2026 · 2026-07-31
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31847 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31847 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L23 31.07.2026 Bpg. dismissed
C.R.M. (A) 1596 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Panskura Police Station Case No.715 of 2024 dated 09.09.2024 under Sections 124/126(2)/75(1)(i)(3/5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act;
Sk. Sahidul @ Saidul @ Sk. Saidul Islam & Ors. Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Suman De. …for the petitioners.
Mr. Sankalpa Bhattacharjee. …for the State.
Mr. Soumya Banerjee Ms. Sucheta Banerjee. …for the de facto complainant.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent who have been falsely implicated in the instant case over different issues.
Learned advocate for the de facto complainant produces the order wherein the bail application of another accused was rejected by this Court.
Learned advocate for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS of the victim.
I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary and I am of the view that this is not a fit case for granting
2 anticipatory bail. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
Accordingly, CRM(A)1596 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)