Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31824 (MAD)

Periyasamy v. The Inspector General of Registration

WP/16195/2026 · 2026-06-04

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 16195 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 16195 of 2026 Periyasamy S/o.Karruppanagounder, periya aandavar kovil kaddu, pallipalayam, bhavani Taluk, Erode District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration, O/o.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai. 2. The District Registrar O/o.District Registrar Office, Erode District, Erode. 3. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Anthiyur, Erode District. 4. The Deputy Tahsildar O/o.Deputy Tahsildar Office, Anthiyur, Erode District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 1 to 3 respondents to register the petitioner partition deed dated 10.03.2026 based on online token temporally No TP/258380362/2026 and reservation Serial No. 5(D-205) dated 10.03.2026 on the file of the 3rd respondent and consequently directing the 4th respondent to consider the application for patta transfer dated 02.03.2026 accordance with law pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit under the circumstances. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 16195 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Sengkodi For Respondent(s): Mr.Roshan Atiq M., Government Counsel for R1 to R3 Ms.Inthu Karunakaran for R4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to register the petitioner partition deed dated 10.03.2026 based on online token. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the land to the extent described in the ‘A’ Schedule to the Partition Deed dated 10.03.2026. It was further submitted that, for the purpose of registration of the said deed, the petitioner obtained an online token from the 3rd respondent Office on 10.03.2026 and thereafter presented Partition Deed along with all necessary documents before the said authority. However, the 3rd respondent returned the petitioner’s Partition Deed without any refusal order and without assigning any valid reason therefor. Aggrieved by the said action, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. In response, learned Government counsel for the respondents submitted that no document was presented before the registering authority for registration. It is further submitted that, in the event, the document is presented for registration, the same shall be received and proceeded in accordance with law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 16195 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Heard both sides and also perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the submissions made on either sides, this Court directs the petitioner to present the document / Partition Deed for registration. Upon such presentation, the 3rd respondent shall receive the same and process the document strictly in accordance with law. 6. This writ petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SK To 1. The Inspector General of Registration, O/o.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai. 2. The District Registrar O/o.District Registrar Office, Erode District, Erode. 3. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Anthiyur, Erode District. 4. The Deputy Tahsildar O/o.Deputy Tahsildar Office, Anthiyur, Erode District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 16195 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. sk WP No. 16195 of 2026 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis