- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010411442022 NC: 2026:KHC:39083 W.P. No.18080/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.18080/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: B.P. VANI W/O LATE DR. BALASUBRAMANIAN .N AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A NO.56/2, 4TH MAIN 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560055. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADV.,) AND: H.K. GOVINDAPPA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.29, VAISHNAVI HOMES 2ND FLOOR, IST MAIN, 10TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAHUL P, ADV., FOR SRI. PAPEGOWDA B, ADV.,) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 08.07.2022 PASSED BY THE COURT OF XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU IN O.S.NO.2447/2015 PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER / PLAINTIFF IN THE Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010411442022 NC: 2026:KHC:39083 W.P. No.18080/2022 SUIT ON 21.04.2022 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B TO THE WRIT PETITION AS PRAYED FOR THEREIN & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER This petition is filed challenging the order dated 08.07.2022 passed in OS.No.2447/2015 by the XVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (for short ‘the trial Court’) 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent in unison submit that the matter is settled and nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. 3. Sri.S.V.Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the respondent has to vacate the premises on petitioner paying the amount. It is - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010411442022 NC: 2026:KHC:39083 W.P. No.18080/2022 further submitted that if the respondent fails to vacate the premises, the petitioner may be permitted to revive the petition. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is disposed of without adjudicating the dispute on merits by recording the aforesaid submissions and granting liberty to both the parties to seek revival, in case the settlement is failed. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33