Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010021792018 2026:GAU-AS:2115 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/161/2018 ON THE DEATH OF MANJU GOPE HER LEGAL HEIRS ARE SMTI SHARMISTHA GOPE D/O LATE CHANDAN GOPE, R/O GOBARDHAN ROAD, TEZPUR TOWN, MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB, P.O- TEZPUR, DIST-SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784001 2: SMTI SUMPRI GOPE D/O LATE CHANDAN GOPE R/O GOBARDHAN ROAD TEZPUR TOWN MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB P.O- TEZPUR DIST-SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784001 3: SMTI MANIKA GOPE S/O LATE ARUP GOPE (SIC) W/O LATE ARUP GOPE R/O GOBARDHAN ROAD TEZPUR TOWN MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB P.O- TEZPUR DIST-SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-78400 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF DIPALI BASU , HER LEGAL HEIRS AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY- 1.1.1:SMTI. PARUL BASU W/O LATE INDRAJIT BASU Page No.# 2/4 R/O N.C. ROAD TEZPUR TOWN MOUZA-MAHABHAIRAB P.O.-TEZPUR DIST-SONITPUR ASSAM-784001 1.1.2:SRI PROSENJIT BASU S/O LATE INDRAJIT BASU R/O N.C. ROAD TEZPUR TOWN MOUZA-MAHABHAIRAB P.O.-TEZPUR DIST-SONITPUR ASSAM-784001 2:SRI SUDIPTA RANJAN GHOSH S/O LATE SUDIPTA RANJAN GHOSH C/O NIHAR RANJAN GHOSH R/O PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM 3:SMTI BINA PANI DEKA W/O LATE RAMANI DEKA R/O DANDI NATH KALITA PATH MAHABHAIRAB TEZPUR TOWN P.O AND P.S- TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784007 4:SRI NABAJYOTI DEKA LATE RAMANI DEKA R/O DANDI NATH KALITA PATH MAHABHAIRAB TEZPUR TOWN P.O AND P.S- TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784007 5:SRI JUBAJYOTI DEKA LATE RAMANI DEKA R/O DANDI NATH KALITA PATH MAHABHAIRAB Page No.# 3/4 TEZPUR TOWN P.O AND P.S- TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784007 6:SMTI GETAXI JYOTI DEKA D/O LATE RAMANI DEKA R/O DANDI NATH KALITA PATH MAHABHAIRAB TEZPUR TOWN P.O AND P.S- TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 78400 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B CHOUDHURY, MR. S SAHU,MS J DAS Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A K GUPTA (R1, R3, R4, R5), MRS K M SAIKIA(R-3),MR. P BORAH(R-3),MR H J TAMULI (R1, R3, R4, R5) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 13.02.2026 None appears for either side. It is reflected in the order dated 19.09.2025, that the matter has already been settled as submitted by learned counsel for the appellant as the appellant has already purchase the suit house. As per instruction from his clients, the learned counsel for the respondent had sought time to obtain proper instruction. Subsequently, the matter was listed on 05.12.2025, where it was again submitted that there might have been a compromise between the parties and sought for time to apprise the Court. Today on call none has appeared. Page No.# 4/4 Hence it is presumed that as settlement may have been effected, appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal. Hence, the matter is dismissed for non-persecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant