CWP No.21894 of 2026 \1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CWP No.21894 of 2026 Date of decision: July 20th, 2026 Ramesh Chand @ Ramesh Kumar Tanwar .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. In the present petition, following prayers have been made: “Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate Writ, order or direction especially in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and finalize the case of the petitioner for allotment of a residential plot under the Oustees policy/quota in lieu of acquired land situated in Sector-10, Gurugram and to allot the eligible plot to the petitioner within fixed time frame. AND Further for issuance of Writ in nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 Administrator, HSVP to decide the representation/reminder dated 16.09.2025 (Annexure P- 6) submitted by the petitioner requesting immediate tracing of file and allotment of residential plot under the oustees category. Further for issuance of Writ in nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 3 Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram to look into the matter and to redress grievance of Petitioner in PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.21 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.21894 of 2026 \2 terms of communication/order dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P- 7) in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had moved an application dated 08.10.2015 for allotment of plot in Sector 10 Gurgaon under oustees category. It is submitted that the same was done in pursuance to an advertisement. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that several reminders were sent and finally vide application 16.09.2025 (Annexure P-6), a final reminder was sent to respondent No.3-Administrator, HSVP. It is submitted that on the said application, recommendation has been made on 30.09.2025 by the office of the Administrator, HSVP, to the Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram, yet no final order has been passed. It is submitted that at this stage the petitioner would be satisfied in case the competent authority considers the application (Annexure P-6) and passes a final order on the same in a time bound manner and in case the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious, then, necessary relief be also granted to the petitioner expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the said application (Annexure P-6) would be considered and decided by respondent No.4 within a period of two months from today and in case the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious, then, necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide application dated 16.09.2025 (Annexure P-6) by passing a PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.21 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.21894 of 2026 \3 speaking order within a period of two months from today. In case, respondent No.4 finds that the pleas raised by the petitioner are meritorious, then, necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner expeditiously. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 20th, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.21 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh