[2026:RJ-JP:17835] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 818/2026 Ankit Kumar Teli S/o Kailash Chand, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Indra Colony, Devliya kalan, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer) --Accused-Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. -------Respondent 2. Hanuman S/o Polu, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ekalsingha, Bhinai, Ajmer. ----Complainant-Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shandilya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Om Prakash, SHO Bhinai, Ajmer HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 28/04/2026 1. The present criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 by the accused-appellant-Ankit Kumar Teli S/o Kailash Chand being aggrieved by the order dated 08.04.2026 passed by Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Ajmer in Second Bail Application No. 368/2026, whereby the learned trial Court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant in connection with FIR No. 293/2025 dated 07.12.2025 registered at Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 189(2), 351(2), 352, 111(2)(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has filed this appeal after the earlier appeal was dismissed by this Court as withdrawn vide order dated 17.03.2026. [2026:RJ-JP:17835] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-818/2026] 3. Learned counsel further submits that the appellant is behind the bars since 07.12.2025 and police, after conducting the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet on 04.03.2026. 4. Learned counsel submits that the case of appellant is at par with the other co-accused persons who have also been enlarged on bail by this Court by previous order while allowing the respective bail S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application bearing Nos. 1599/2026 and 1600/2026 vide order dated 17.03.2026. 5. Learned counsel submits that appellant would not violate any condition imposed by this Court and further shall not attempt to make any contact with the complainant and the witnesses. In view of the long incarceration, learned counsel prays that the appellant may be enlarged on bail. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail. 7. This Court considered that appellant is behind the bars since 07.12.2025, no recovery is required to be made from him and the other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail on a similar ground. 8. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 08.04.2026 passed by the Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Ajmer is set aside and it is ordered that the accused-appellant Ankit Kumar Teli S/o Kailash Chand arrested in connection with the FIR No. 293/2025 shall be released on bail; provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till [2026:RJ-JP:17835] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-818/2026] the completion of the trial. The appellant is further directed not to take undue advantage or misuse of liberty granted by this Court. 9. It is made clear that the observations, as made by this Court in the appeal, will not affect the trial of the case. 10. However, appellant is directed not to make any attempt to contact the complainant and the witnesses. In case any such attempt is made, then the Public Prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J PARSHANT /322