Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23654 of 2018 ====================================================== Deepak Kumar S/o Late Nunu Chandra Bhaskar at present R/o Vill- Sherpura, P.O.- Sadopur, P.S.- Alipur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.
3. The Additional Collector, Gaya, Dist- Gaya.
4. The DCLR, Tekari.
5. Smt. Sharda Devi, W/o Ramswarup Sharma, R/o Vill- Sherpura, P.O.- Sadopur, P.S.- Alipur, Dist- Gaya.
6. Smt. Shail Devi, W/o Late Raman Sharma, R/o Vill- Sherpura, P.O.- Sadopur, P.S.- Alipur, Dist- Gaya at present residing in Vill- Bira, P.S.- Hulasganj Ghosi, Dist- Jehanabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiw Kumar Prabhakar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, G.P. 14 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 06-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): (i) To set aside order dt. 20.07.2018 passed by Ld. The Chairman, Bihar Land Tribunal Patna in BLT Case 455/2017, Deepak Kumar V/s State of Bihar & ors. Whereby and where under Ld. Chairman BLT was pleased to dismiss the application of the petitioner to set aside
order dt. 01.03.2017 passed by Ld. Court of Commissioner, Magadh Division Gaya in
Patna High Court CWJC No.23654 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 land ceiling Revision Case No. 227/2014 and consequentially to also set aside order dt. 01.03.2017 passed by Ld. Court of Commissioner Magadh Division Gaya passed in Ceiling Revision Case 227/2014 and order dt. 24.07.2002 passed by Ld. Court of DCLR Tekari passed in Ceiling Case No. 6/2001-02. (ii) To confirm the order dt. 16.12.2013 passed by Ld. Court of Assistant Collector, Gaya in Ceiling Appeal case 66/2011 and order to issuance of necessary paper/document by the authority concerned in the name of this petitioner. (iii) To grant any relief/reliefs such other for which this petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the changed circumstance relating to pre-emption matter, the writ petition has become infructuous, as such, appropriate
order be passed.
4. The writ petition have become infructuous, is
disposed of.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U