Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3178 (RAJ)

LOKESH KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SHRI RAJENDRA SHARMA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1259/2024 · 2026-04-20

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16614] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1259/2024 Lokesh Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Rajendra Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, Resident of House No. 69, Goverdhan Dham First, Luniyawas, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General of Police, Jaipur (Raj). 3. The Dy. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (South) (Raj). 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur (South), (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/04/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. [2026:RJ-JP:16614] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1259/2024] 2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long, on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made for issuance of directions to the Investigating Officer to conduct a fair and impartial investigation of the impugned FIR No.982/2023, registered with the Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 149, 34, 120B, 325, 341, 336 & 364 IPC. 4. It appears that the alleged incident had occurred in the intervening night of 23.11.2023 & 24.11.2023 and the impugned FIR was registered by the petitioner on 17.12.2023. Further, when the investigation was not conducted seriously, he submitted representation before the Police Commissioner, Jaipur City for issuing directions to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fare investigation. 5. It appears that no reply was given to the aforesaid representation. Hence, under these circumstances the petitioner has approached this Court by way filing the instant petition. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition, while granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Police Commissioner, Jaipur City again by way of filing one additional representation for redressal of his grievances, in case such representation submitted by the petitioner, it is expected from the Police Commissioner, Jaipur City to decide the same strictly in accordance with law along with a direction to be issued [2026:RJ-JP:16614] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1259/2024] to the concerned Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) to make fair and impartial investigation of the instant matter and submit the conclusion report of investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the Concerned Court expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam/14