Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31777 (PNJ)

SHAMSHER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/15939/2024 · 2026-07-20

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[282] Shamsher Singh State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] writ petition has been rende [2] present writ petition is [3] disposed off 20.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15939 Date of Decision : Shamsher Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 & 5. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, counsel for the petitioner writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 20.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15939-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. Advocate and Advocate for the petitioner submits that the present red infructuous. In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the as having been rendered infructuous. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No submits that the present In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.21 16:47 I agree to specified portions of this document