Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31777 (KAR)

SMT K HONNAMMA v. SMT BYRAMMA

WP/1382/2023 · 2026-07-28

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010034772023 NC: 2026:KHC:39200 W.P. No.1382/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.1382/2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. K. HONNAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O PUTTASWAMY R/AT NO.26, “SRI MANJUNATHA NILAYA” KONANAKUNTE CROSS CANARA BANK DEAD END ROAD 2ND CROSS, KAILASHNAGAR KANAKAPURA ROAD BENGALURU-560062. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D. BOREGOWDA, ADV., [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. BYRAMMA W/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS. 2. SMT. KUMUDAVATHI W/O KALAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 3. SRI. K. GANESHA S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010034772023 NC: 2026:KHC:39200 W.P. No.1382/2023 R1 TO R3 ARE ALL R/AT AREKADAKALU VILLAGE MARALAWADI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. 4. SRI. K.S. VIDYASHANKAR S/O K.B. SATHYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.24 11TH A MAIN ROAD 5TH EXTENSION, JAYANAGARA BENGALURU CITY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. ABHINAV ANAND, ADV., FOR R1 TO R3 V/O/DTD:31.10.2023, NOTICE TO R4 IS H/S) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 21.07.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.288/2015 ON IA.NO.5 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT KANAKAPURA AT ANNEXURE-E AND THEREBY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010034772023 NC: 2026:KHC:39200 W.P. No.1382/2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 30.08.2025. Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Sri.K.Abhinav Anand, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 is present. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45