IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3241 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1. Ranjan Yadav @ Vasisth Yadav S/o Bharath Yadav R/o vill - Madhu Sareya, P.S.- Manjhagarh, Distt.- Gopalganj 2. Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar Yadav S/o Dasrath Yadav R/o vill - Madhu Sareya, P.S.- Manjhagarh, Distt.- Gopalganj 3. Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar Yadav S/o Kishore Yadav R/o vill - Madhu Sareya, P.S.- Manjhagarh, Distt.- Gopalganj 4. Dinesh Yadav S/o Late Sadavriksh Yadav R/o vill - Madhu Sareya, P.S.- Manjhagarh, Distt.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anand Vardhan & Ms. Shubhangi Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 303(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 117(2), 118(1), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from perusal of F.I.R., it is apparent that specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Laxman Yadav and Ranjay Yadav. So far as these petitioners are concerned, allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Learned counsel further submits that on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3241 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026 2/2 account of land dispute between the parties, Maarpeet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Present case is counter blast of Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 295 of 2025, which was lodged by one of the co-accused against informant and others. Petitioner nos. 1, 3 & 4 claim clean antecedent, whereas, petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent, in which, he is on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 298 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T