Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31752 (MAD)

SAKTHIVEL v. The Commissioner of Land Administration

WP/15091/2026 · 2026-06-02

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 15091 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 15091 of 2026 Sakthivel S/o.Chinnasamy No.2/335 colony Vasistapuram village Thungapuram via peerambalur District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration 2nd floor, Ezhilagam chepauk chennai 2. The District collector District collector office Perambalur Perambalur District 3. The Revenue Tahsildar Kunnam Taluk Perambalur District 4. The Revenue Divisional officer Kunnam Revenue Division Perambalur District 5. Kandhasamy S/o.Subbaiah New colony, Vasistapuram village Thungapuram Via Perambalur District ..Respondent(s) __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15091 of 2026 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1, to disposed the appeal filed by the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Honble court For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Manoharan For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt’s counsel for R1 to 4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner. 2. Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, initially, the 2nd respondent had passed an order dated 25.06.2025 rejecting the request of the petitioner. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an appeal dated 08.07.2025 before the 1st respondent. However, the said appeal was not at all considered by the 1st respondent till date. Hence, this petition. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15091 of 2026 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s appeal will be disposed of within a period of 4 months and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 16 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 9. Post this matter for reporting compliance on 01.10.2026. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15091 of 2026 To 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration 2nd floor, Ezhilagam chepauk chennai 2. The District collector District collector office Perambalur Perambalur District 3. The Revenue Tahsildar Kunnam Taluk Perambalur District 4. The Revenue Divisional officer Kunnam Revenue Division Perambalur District __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15091 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 15091 of 2026 02-06-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis