Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31751 (CAL)

SHARMISTHA CHAUDHURI v. NOVUS IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED

AP-COM/587/2026 · 2026-07-31

Gaurang Kanth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OCD-8 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA COMMERCIAL DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE AP-COM/587/2026 SHARMISTHA CHAUDHURI VS NOVUS IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH Date : 31st July, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Debdut Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Gaurab Kr. Das, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Berlia, Adv. Ms. Urvashi Jain, Adv. …for the petitioner The Court: Affidavit of service is taken on record. Despite service, none appears for the respondent. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for completion of the arbitral proceedings and publication of the arbitral award. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has been extended by this Court vide order dated 07.11.2025 for a period of eight months till 06.07.2026. He further states that the matter is listed for pronouncement of the award. Upon consideration of the submissions of both the parties and the materials placed on record, this Court is satisfied that there has been no 2 undue or unwarranted delay on the part of the learned sole Arbitrator in conducting the proceedings. Having regard to the advanced stage of the proceedings and in the interest of justice, the mandate of the learned sole Arbitrator is extended further for a period of one month from today for publication of the award. The learned sole Arbitrator is requested to make all reasonable endeavours to conclude the arbitral proceedings and publish the arbitral award within the extended time period. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition stands disposed of. (GAURANG KANTH, J.) R.Bhar