[2026:RJ-JP:16591] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4238/2026 Raghuvir Nagar S/o Hariram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bilasra, Police Station Khanpur, Dist. Jhalawar (Raj.), Presently In District Jail, Jhalawar. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Meeta Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 20/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 242/2025 registered at Police Station Khanpur, District Jhalawar for offence under Section 103(1) of the BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been implicated as an accused on the basis of the false and fabricated facts. Counsel further submits that as per the facts on record, the deceased was in a drunken position and might have sustained injuries by falling down on some stone. Counsel also submits that none of the material witnesses, examined so far, has made any allegation against the accused- petitioner of causing injuries to the deceased, as they have stated that there are no eyewitnesses to the incident. Counsel further [2026:RJ-JP:16591] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4238/2026] submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2025, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that in the Police statement, the witness Kapil Rathore has stated that there was some scuffle in between the accused-petitioner and the deceased and he heard the voice of the scuffle, while he was in the house. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the challan papers and so also the statements of the witnesses examined so far. 5. As per the facts on record, the accused-petitioner and the deceased both were in a drunken position and there was some scuffle in between them. It has also come out on record that both the accused-petitioner and the deceased used to have liquor together since long and looking to the facts on record, the possibility of sustaining injuries by falling down, cannot be ruled out. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also prosecution evidence recorded so far by the learned trial Court, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:16591] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4238/2026] Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /26